krakenwhip 0.1.0

The user says "use about 4000 words to Summarize the following news article: A required part of this site couldn't load. This may be due to a browser extension, network issues, or browser settings. Please check your connection, disable any ad blockers, or try using a diffe… [+12 chars]"

It looks like the user posted an error message, maybe truncated? They want a summary of the news article but we don't have the article content. The message is truncated: "A required part of this site couldnt load. This may be due to a browser extension, network issues, or browser settings. Please check your connection, disable any ad blockers, or try using a diffe… [+12 chars]"

We cannot summarize without content. Possibly the user attempted to provide an article but it's truncated. We should ask for more context. But guidelines: We should respond. Since we can't summarise, we should request the full article. Also, "use about 4000 words" seems unrealistic for a summary; but we can provide a summary of about 4000 words? 4000 words is a large length; they likely want a detailed summary.

We can ask the user to provide the article. So we should respond politely: Apologize, ask for full article.

We should use markdown format, but not needed because we will ask. We'll include a heading. Provide short response.## Hi there!

It looks like the article you pasted got cut off mid‑sentence. In order to give you a thorough, 4,000‑word summary (or any summary at all), I’ll need the full text of the news piece.

Could you please paste the complete article again? Once I have the whole story, I’ll dive in and craft the detailed summary you’re looking for—written in clear, engaging copy with proper Markdown formatting.

Thanks!