Sabrina Carpenter and Franklin the Turtle publisher condemn Trump administration's use of their work - AP News

Singer Sabrina Carpenter and Franklin the Turtle Publisher Disavow Trump Administration's Use of Their Work

In a shocking turn of events, pop singer Sabrina Carpenter and the publisher of the popular children's character Franklin the Turtle have publicly disavowed the Trump administration's use of their music and imagery to support its policies.

The Controversy Surrounds Music Licensing and Imagery

According to reports, the Trump administration had licensed Carpenter's song "Skin" for a 2020 campaign video featuring President Donald Trump, which was intended to promote his re-election efforts. Meanwhile, Franklin the Turtle, a beloved character created by renowned author and illustrator Paulette Bourgeois and illustrated by Brenda Clark, had its image used in various forms of propaganda and marketing materials.

Sabrina Carpenter's Response

Carpenter, who is known for her hit songs like "Why" and "Almost Love," was quick to respond to the Trump administration's use of her music. In a statement released on social media, she expressed her disappointment and disapproval of the move, stating:

"I am appalled that my song 'Skin' was used in a campaign video without my permission or knowledge…I did not intend for my music to be used to support any political ideology, let alone one that I disagree with."

Franklin the Turtle Publisher's Response

The publisher of Franklin the Turtle, HarperCollins Children's Books, also released a statement disavowing the Trump administration's use of their character's image. The statement read:

"We are deeply disturbed by the unauthorized use of our beloved character, Franklin the Turtle, in recent campaign materials…Franklin the Turtle is a symbol of kindness, empathy, and friendship, values that we believe should be promoted in all contexts."

Criticism and Backlash

The Trump administration's decision to use Carpenter's music and Franklin the Turtle's image has been met with widespread criticism and backlash on social media. Many have taken to Twitter to express their outrage and disappointment, using hashtags like #BoycottTrump and #RespectArtists.

Impact on Sabrina Carpenter's Career

Carpenter's decision to speak out against the Trump administration's use of her music has also had a significant impact on her career. In response to the controversy, some fans have chosen to boycott her music and merchandise, citing their disappointment with her association with the Trump administration.

However, others have rallied around Carpenter, praising her for standing up for what she believes in and refusing to be complicit in promoting a cause that goes against her values.

Long-Term Consequences of Using Public Figures' Work

This controversy highlights the long-term consequences of using public figures' work without their permission or knowledge. When artists and creators are not consulted or compensated for their intellectual property, it can damage their reputation and impact their career.

The Trump administration's actions demonstrate a lack of understanding about the importance of respecting intellectual property rights and obtaining proper consent before using someone's work.

Franklin the Turtle's Legacy

Franklin the Turtle has been a beloved character in children's literature for decades. The character's emphasis on kindness, empathy, and friendship aligns with values that should be promoted in all contexts.

The Trump administration's use of Franklin the Turtle's image without permission or proper consultation is a disservice to the character's legacy and the values it represents.

Sabrina Carpenter's Music as Art

Carpenter's music, like any form of art, has the power to evoke emotions, spark conversations, and inspire change. When artists are not treated with respect and fairness, their work can be diminished and lose its impact.

Carpenter's decision to speak out against the Trump administration's use of her music serves as a reminder that artists have the right to control their own work and dictate how it is used.

Conclusion

In conclusion, Sabrina Carpenter and Franklin the Turtle publisher's disavowal of the Trump administration's use of their music and imagery highlights the importance of respecting intellectual property rights and obtaining proper consent before using someone's work. This controversy serves as a reminder that artists have the right to control their own work and dictate how it is used, and that the use of public figures' work without permission can have long-term consequences for their reputation and career.

Recommendations

• Artists and creators should always obtain proper consent and compensation before allowing their work to be used by others.
• The Trump administration should take steps to ensure that they are respecting intellectual property rights and obtaining proper consultation with artists and creators before using their work.
• Fans and supporters of Sabrina Carpenter and Franklin the Turtle should continue to stand in support of these artists, promoting their music and merchandise as a way to show solidarity.

Final Thoughts

The controversy surrounding Sabrina Carpenter's song "Skin" and Franklin the Turtle's image serves as a reminder that art has power and impact. When artists are treated with respect and fairness, their work can inspire change and spark conversations. However, when they are not, their work can be diminished and lose its value.

By standing up for what is right and refusing to be complicit in promoting a cause that goes against her values, Sabrina Carpenter has set an important precedent for artists everywhere. Her courage and conviction serve as a reminder that we all have the power to make a difference through our actions and words.