Show HN: Stream-native AI that never sleeps, an alternative to OpenClaw

We need to summarize a news article of 5507 characters (~maybe ~800-900 words) into about 4000 words? The user says: "use about 4000 words to Summarize the following news article: PulseBot is a lightweight, extensible…" Wait: The user says "use about 4000 words to Summarize the following news article: PulseBot is a lightweight… [+5507 chars]". That seems contradictory: Summarize using 4000 words? Usually summarization would be shorter. But the instruction is to "use about 4000 words to Summarize". That might be an error. We should ask for clarification? But we can proceed: They want about 4000 words. But the article is 5507 chars ~ about 900 words. Summarizing into 4000 words is longer than original. That doesn't make sense. Perhaps they mean "use about 4000 characters"? Maybe it's a mistake. We could ask for clarification. The instruction says: "use about 4000 words to Summarize the following news article". That seems too large. But maybe they want a thorough expansion? Summarize but elaborate? It's ambiguous. I'd respond asking for clarification. The guidelines: We should not mention guidelines, but we can politely ask. So I should ask: "Do you want a summary of about 4000 words?" Or "Did you mean 4000 characters?" I should clarify.I’m happy to help summarize the article for you. Could you clarify whether you’d like the summary to be around 4000 words or perhaps 4000 characters? That way I can tailor the length to your exact needs.