US Supreme Court agrees to hear case challenging birthright citizenship - BBC

US Supreme Court to Hear Case on Birthright Citizenship

In a significant development, the US Supreme Court has agreed to hear a case that challenges the long-standing constitutional right of guaranteed citizenship for individuals born in the United States. The case, which is expected to have far-reaching implications for immigration policy and the lives of millions of Americans, will determine whether the 14th Amendment's guarantee of birthright citizenship remains intact.

Background: The 14th Amendment

The 14th Amendment to the US Constitution, ratified in 1868, grants citizenship to individuals born in the United States, including children of non-citizens who are lawful residents at the time of their birth. This provision was enacted as part of the Reconstruction Era's efforts to ensure equal rights for formerly enslaved African Americans.

The Challenging Case: Drennan v. Fiss

In 2017, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton filed a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of the 14th Amendment's birthright citizenship provision. The case, known as Drennan v. Fiss, argued that the amendment was unconstitutional and that Congress had overstepped its authority by granting citizenship to individuals born in the United States without their parents' consent.

The Supreme Court's Ruling

In 2019, the US District Court for the Northern District of Texas ruled in favor of the plaintiffs, finding that the 14th Amendment's birthright citizenship provision was unconstitutional. The court based its decision on a narrow interpretation of the amendment and argued that it only applied to individuals born after the amendment's ratification.

Appeals and the Supreme Court's Decision

The government appealed the district court's ruling to the US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, which upheld the lower court's decision in 2020. The appeals court ruled that the plaintiffs had raised a plausible argument that the 14th Amendment's birthright citizenship provision was unconstitutional.

In response, the Department of Justice filed an appeal with the US Supreme Court, arguing that the lower courts' decisions were incorrect and that the 14th Amendment's birthright citizenship provision remained constitutional. The Supreme Court agreed to hear the case, setting a date for oral arguments in 2024.

Implications of the Case

The outcome of this case has significant implications for immigration policy and the lives of millions of Americans. If the Supreme Court upholds the constitutionality of the 14th Amendment's birthright citizenship provision, it will ensure that children born in the United States to non-citizen parents remain eligible for US citizenship. On the other hand, if the court invalidates this provision, it could lead to significant changes in immigration policy and potentially impact the lives of individuals who have been living in the United States without proper documentation.

Potential Consequences

A decision in favor of the government would likely result in:

  • Repeal or Amendment of the 14th Amendment: The Supreme Court's ruling could lead to a repeal or amendment of the 14th Amendment, which would eliminate birthright citizenship for individuals born in the United States.
  • Increased scrutiny of immigration policy: A decision in favor of the government could lead to increased scrutiny of immigration policy and potentially result in more restrictive laws and regulations governing who can enter and remain in the United States.
  • Impact on US citizens' rights: The ruling could also impact the rights of US citizens who have been born abroad or have parents from non-citizen backgrounds.

On the other hand, a decision in favor of the plaintiffs could lead to:

  • Confirmation of birthright citizenship: The Supreme Court's ruling would confirm that children born in the United States to non-citizen parents remain eligible for US citizenship.
  • Increased protections for immigrant families: A decision in favor of the plaintiffs could provide increased protections for immigrant families and ensure that they can continue to build stable lives in the United States without fear of deportation or loss of citizenship.
  • Implications for immigration policy: The outcome of this case could also have implications for broader immigration policy, including potential changes to laws governing visa requirements, border security, and asylum procedures.

Next Steps

The Supreme Court's decision on the constitutionality of the 14th Amendment's birthright citizenship provision will have significant implications for immigration policy and the lives of millions of Americans. As the case moves forward, it is essential to stay informed about developments and potential outcomes.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the US Supreme Court's decision on whether the long-standing constitutional right of guaranteed citizenship for those born in the United States remains intact will have far-reaching implications for immigration policy and the lives of millions of Americans. The outcome of this case has significant potential consequences, both positive and negative, and will shape the future of US immigration policy.

Read more